|
"For
me beauty and horror have always been quite close".
|
LYNNE
RAMSAY STARTS WITH A PUNCH
By Dennis Lim
Village Voice,
October 17, 2000
"People
tend to romanticize childhood," says Glasgow-born director Lynne
Ramsay. "I think it's actually quite a brutal place. I'm not interested
in cutesy coming-of-age dramas; I much prefer something like Lord
of the Flies. Children are shown a kind of hypocrisy in the
adult world. People want to protect children, but children are never
protected, really."
Ramsay's first feature, Ratcatcher,
beautifully captures both the agonizing vulnerability and the escapist
flights of an impoverished childhood. Dreamily suspended between
kitchen-sink and magical realism, it's an unsentimental, impressionist
portrait that balances unblinking squalor and hallucinatory reveries
against the startling backdrop of the mid-70's refuse workers' strike.
Though Ratcatcher is less autobiographical than her prizewinning
shorts, Gasman and Small Deaths, Ramsay drew heavily
on her memories of the period. "I was about five, and the city was
under siege, but it was magical, like this great playground--it
felt almost medieval. For me beauty and horror have always been
quite close, and that's often how kids are--you know, like the fascination
they feel in looking at a dead animal."
Ramsay says it was unfortunately easy
to find suitably grim locations. "Those places do exist, although
I'm sure the Scottish tourist board would rather not know that.
We were even told, 'Don't bother to bring the rats--they're already
here.' The people on the street we shot on were quite suspicious.
But we got some of them involved as extras and it became almost
like a community project." Much of the budget was devoted to building
a polluted canal that looms large in the film--not just physically
but psychologically and metaphorically, as the site of a defining
trauma and the ominous locus of murky, unspoken fantasy. "It was
quite ambitious for the money that we had," says Ramsay, "but I
had a bonkers designer. We dug a big hole and actually found some
toxic waste, which cost a lot to take away."
Ratcatcher
opens with a trance-inducing slow-motion shot of a boy at play,
wrapping himself up mummy-like in lace curtains--and proceeds to
wrong-foot the viewer by brutally killing off the kid in question
and shifting the focus to his guilt-ridden friend, James. "The boy
who drowns is more of a conventional cute kid," says Ramsay. "But
I wanted to tell a story about this other kind of boy, who you're
not too sure of. The first scene also sums up a lot of the film
for me. It's poetic, and there's something scary about it, and then
you're slapped back into this harsh reality."
Ramsay doesn't dispute the bleakness of
her film--"I tired to get to the root of what it's like being a
12-year old when there's not a lot of future"--but refuses to see
it as a direct descendant of the British miserablist tradition.
"I also wanted to show the other side, which is incredibly naďve
and simple and beautiful. When people say the film's dark and heavy,
it really pisses me off. I'll show you a few dark, heavy films that'll
make this look like Disney."
Since Ratcatcher premiered at Cannes
last year, Ramsay has attained next-big-thing status in the U.K.
(she won a BAFTA, among other awards) and, to her annoyance, has
been subjected to numerous lofty comparisons--from Bresson to Malick,
Loach to Scottish director Bill Douglas. "It's flattering, but when
people compare it to social realism, it's as if they're not seeing
the film,' she says. "And I get this 'you're Scottish, you're a
woman' thing, which just makes you feel marginalized."
In the move from short films to features,
Ramsay says, "You get a lot of pressure to become a different kind
of filmmaker, and you wonder why people asked you to make the film
in the first place. I'm a bit of a fighter, though--I mean, if I
don't feel something's right, I just can't sleep and it drives me
absolutely mad." Ramsay did have to fight to keep the film's resolutely
ambiguous ending. "I think there was pressure to have a happy ending
from the financiers' and in my own way, it is a happy ending." She
adds with a laugh: "I get letters with stamped self-addressed envelopes,
asking, 'Please tell me what happened.'" (She doesnąt reply, so
don't bother writing).
Using all first-time
crew and a mostly non-professional cast, Ramsay elicits remarkable
performances from the untrained child actors (including William
Eadie as James and the director's niece, Lynne Ramsay Jr., as James's
sister). "I'm always looking out for the spontaneity in a very controlled
situation," says Ramsay. "The camera's often quite close, but I
got the kids use to that early on, just going around with a video
camera. I never showed them the script, so it was exciting for them."
Movies were
not a big part of Ramsay's own childhood. "If someone had said
to me that I was going to be a filmmaker, I'd be like, Yeah, right.
It was quite a working-class area where I grew up--you're more
likely to go to work when you're 16; there don't seem to be a
lot of options. But I did love musicals. I was brought up on them.
It was quite funny seeing Dancer in the Dark. You look
at something like Singin' in the Rain compared to that,
and you're like, fucking hell, they really knew what they were
doing." She ended up in art school in Edinburgh, where she pursued
a photography degree. The plan was then to attend the Royal College
of Art in London, but after seeing Maya Deren's Meshes in the
Afternoon, she applied to the National Film School and was
accepted to study cinematography. "I was terrible," she says laughing.
"I could make a beautiful still but I couldn't move the camera."
Her photography background still informs her work: "I home in
on details as a way of embellishing the character," she says.
"I like to make the minutiae the most important drama."
Clearly not afraid to speak her mind
("I just know that when I see a film, I want to come away not
feeling like someone's just shat in my head"), Ramsay says she's
learned some important practical lessons from her first feature.
"I don't want the production work for me. I like longer shoots,
smaller crews; I don't want so many assistants. With the production
system on Ratcatcher, it was like trying to fit a square
peg into a round hole. The system's so conventional, it can seem
stupid. I admire people like Michael Winterbottom, who get around
it."
Her next movie,
which will star Samantha Morton, is an adaptation of Morvern
Callar, a novel by young Scottish writer Alan Warner. "It's
a mental road movie about a girl who works in a supermarket in
this little town on the west coast of Scotland, which is like
the Midwest of America, and she gets out of that lifestyle by
the most extraordinary means. It's sort of like Camus for teenagers."
Ramsay says the script has been a struggle. "It's similar in structure
to Ratcatcher--it starts with a punch, which you're forever
trying to match." She admits to being wary of the high expectations
in place for her second film. "It makes you want to lock your
doors or run away," she says. "I don't want too much pressure.
I'd rather remain a wee bit anonymous. You know, I still feel
like a student sometimes."
|